The Legal Doctrine of "Fact" in Lunacy, and the Case of George Clark

On the 27^ ?f February last, George Clark, a cabinet-maker, 45 years of age, was tried at Newcastle, before Mr. Justice Willes, for the wilful murder of Mark Frater, a tax-gatherer, 011 the 1st October, 1861. The prisoner pleaded "Not Guilty," and he refused to be aided by counsel, stating that he would defend himself. Upon this the Judge interposed, and said, "Have you any counsel ?" Prisoner.?"I will address the judge: I will address the power." Judge?" Don't you think you had better let the court assign you counsel ?" Prisoner.?" No, none." The Clerk of Arraigns was proceeding with his duty, when the prisoner interrupted him with the remark, "It is my duty for to address the court first." Judge.?"The jury will be in the box, and if you wish to object to any one of them, you may do so." Prisoner.? " I have something relating to the high honour in this town, and not only in this town, but in England. I may have to address the power." The jury was then sworn, and the trial proceeded. The prisoner is described as presenting " but little appreciable difference in appearance" from that which he presented at the